You are not logged in.
Dear users of this forum,
we are pleased to inform you that we will be updating the software behind this forum in the near future.
Existing posts, users and categories will remain untouched.
Important:
We will keep you informed in the pinned thread.
Kind regards,
Your ReportServer Team
Liebe Nutzer dieses Forums,
wir freuen uns, euch mitteilen zu können, dass wir in naher Zukunft die Software hinter diesem Forum aktualisieren werden.
Existierende Beiträge, Nutzer und Kategorien bleiben weiterhin bestehen!
Wichtig:
Wir halten euch im angepinnten Beitrag auf dem Laufenden!
Mit vielen Grüßen
Euer ReportServer Team
Pages: 1
Hello, I am in the initial phases of using the reportserver, was able to configure datasource. But can someone help me clarify the below mentioned in the datasources documentation
Admin guide -> Chapter 2 -> Section 2.3 - https://reportserver.net/en/guides/admi … ata-source
"Below the Root folder, the folder "internal data sources" should already be located. Beside the existing folder, create another one: Right click on "Data source Root" -> Insert -> Folder. Now, select the newly created folder "unnamed". In the right part of the window you can edit the properties of the currently selected object. Rename the folder to "Demo data" and click on the Apply button."
In the admin section, what is the reason to create another folder besides the existing "internal datasources -> ReportServer Data source". Does this existing instance have any significance that the ReportServer is meant to store anything on this instance? And Is it a must to create a new folder and create my project datasource in that or it is ok to use the "ReportServer Data source" instance.
Also, if I create a new instance of datasource under a new folder, how can I point the ReportServer to that new datasource folder? Is there a configuration setting for that?
What are the best practices to configure data sources?
Last edited by shahidkapoor (2017-11-24 18:58:38)
Offline
Hi Shihidkapoor,
in theory there is no need for any folder in the data-source tree and you can store everything on root level. Thus said it has been an established best practice to separate objects depending on their category or meaning. Therefore it makes sense to create a separate folder for the internal data-source, i. e. the data-source reportserver uses to store its (meta)data, and all other data-sources you need to access the data to report on.
This distinction is artificial: Of course you will access the metadata repository with reports reg. Report Execution frequency or User behavior as well, but it helps administering (for example access rights on data-sources).
ReportServer can have as many data-sources as you define. The data-source a reports uses to access its data during execution is defined in the report itself. I just want to briefly mention the concept of a data-source bundle: You can have a single report accessing many data-sources depending on the credentials or the selection of the user.
Happy reporting
jan
Offline
Ok I guess I understood. So to make sure if I get this correct, the 'internal data sources' -> 'ReportServer Data Source' could be the place where report server stores its meta data information. And it will be a good practice to create application data source in a separate folder and build reports off of this application data-source. This way the report server meta information and application data are separated.
Offline
Hi shahidkapoor,
yes, it is a good practice to create a different folder with your application datasources. These will be in most of the cases different that your internal datasource. The internal data source points to the database where reportserver is installed. In most of the cases, your reportserver will create reports on other datasources. So the meta information is in most of the cases separated from the data your are reporting on.
Regards,
Eduardo
Offline
Thanks for confirming!
Offline
Pages: 1